Professor Peter Woll's

Administrative Law- On Line

Politics 117a

Administrative Law

Course Syllabus

Spring 2013

Class assignments will be made from the following and will be posted on a daily basis on the WebCT course Calendar and also on the class listserv.

Class Assignments I

Class Assignments II

Class Assignments III

Text

Strauss et al

Gellhorn and Byse’s Administrative Law

10th ed. Revised

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix

TABLE OF CASES xxxvii

TABLE OF TEXT AND PERIODICAL CITATIONS lxxi

TABLE OF STATUTES lxxxvii

An Introduction to Administrative Law

Agencies and the Structural Constitution

Procedural Frameworks for Administrative Action

The Procedural Categories in Action: Adjudication

The Procedural Categories in Action: Rulemaking

Open Government and the Freedom of Information Act

Procedural Due Process: Constitutional Constraints on Administrative Decision-making

Scope of Review of Administrative Action

Obtaining Judicial Review: Access to Court to Challenge Agency Action or Inaction

CHAPTER I An Introduction to Administrative Law 1

Sec.

1. An Introductory Problem l

2. The Basics 7

3. The Development of the Administrative State 13

Robert L. Rabin, Feder:al Regulation in Historical Perspective 13

Notes 23

4. Perspectives on the Enterprise of Administrative Law 26

A Note on Teaching and Studying Administrative Law from This Casebook 34

~

CHAPTER II Agencies and the Structural Constitution 35

Sec.


1. The Constitutionality of Empowering Agencies to Make and Enforce Regulatory Policy 37

American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency 38

American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency 46

Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc. 48

Notes 56

a. Nondelegation and the Problem of Taxonomy 63

b. Delegation in the Cases-The Long Road to American Trucking 66

c. The Future of Non-delegation Doctrine 77

d. Comparative Insights: The Experience of Other Jurisdictions 83

(1) Delegation in the States 84

Boreali v. Axelrod 84

Note 88

Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. Lewellen 89

Note 96

(2) Delegation in Europe 96

Peter Lindseth, Delegation is Dead, Long Live Delegation: Managing the Democratic Disconnect in the European

Market-Polity 97

.

2. Assessing the Constitutionality of the Administrative State 101

a. Competing Views: Is the Regulatory State Constitutional? 102

Gary Lawson, The Rise and the Rise of the Administrative State 103

Bruce A. Ackerman, The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution 107

Peter L. Strauss, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch 109

b. Contrasting Methodologies 112

Sec.3. The Constitutionality of Empowering Agencies to Adjudicate Individual Disputes 118

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor 121

Notes on the Precedent Underlying Schor 127

Notes on the Future of the Public/Private Rights Distinction, and the Relevance of the Seventh Amendment 133

4. Controlling Agency Power: Constitutional Issues in Congressional and Presidential Oversight Efforts 138

a. Controlling Policy by Controlling Who Makes It-Appointment and Removal of Agency Officials 140

(i) The Reach of Presidential Power 143

Myers v. United States 143

Notes 149

Humphrey's Executor v. United States 153

Notes 156

Morrison v. Olson 160

Notes 170

(ii) The Limits of Congressional Prerogative 176

Bowsher v. Synar 176

Notes 184

Notes on Congressional Attempts to Control Regulatory Policy via Appointment and Confirmation 186

b. Controlling Policy Through Veto, Directive, and Budget 191

(i) Efforts Directly to Override, or to Command, Regulatory Decisions 193

Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha 193

Notes 203

Notes on Alternatives to the Legislative Veto: Congressional Direction via Legislation and Committee Oversight 208

Notes on Presidential Power to Direct Agency Decisions 212

(ii) Efforts to Control Policy by Controlling Spending 222

Clinton v. City of New York 224

Notes 232

Notes on Appropriations: Directing Policy With the Purse Strings 233

Concluding Thoughts 237


CHAPTER III Procedural Frameworks for Administrative Action 238

Sec.

1. The Fundamental Procedural Categories of Administrative Action: Adjudication and Rulemaking 238

a. The Constitution 238

Londoner v. Denver 238

Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Colorado 241

Notes on Londoner-Bi-Metallic 243

Notes on Procedures' Ends and Means 247

Sec.

1. The Fundamental Procedural Categories of Administrative Action:

Adjudication and Rulemaking-Continued

. b. The Fundamental Statute 252

Administration Procedure Act of 1946 252

Notes 252

Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath 254

Notes 261

Dickinson, Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Mary E. Zurko et al. 264

Notes 268

Notes on Changing Approaches to the APA Over the Years 271

c. Additional Sources of Procedural Constraint 275

2. Proceedings Outside the Fundamental Procedural Categories-

Information Gathering 276

A Note on Information as Regulation-EPA's Toxic Resources Inventory 277

a. Choices of Government Regulatory Style in Inspecting 281

Notes on the Choices of Style and Their Constraints 282

Making Do With Less-Notes on a Return to. "Cooperation" and Voluntarism 288

b. Required Forms and Reports 291

c. Rights to Refuse Cooperation with Information Demands 294

Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc 295

Notes on the Cases Before Barlow's 301

Notes on the Closely Regulated Industry Exception 302

Notes on Practical Impact and Other Issues 308

Braswell v. United States 313

CHAPTER IV The Procedural Categories in Action: Adjudication 322

Sec.

1.Initial Hearings in Formal Adjudication 324

Seacoast Anti-Pollution League v. Costle 325

Notes 332

a. Who is Entitled to Participate? 334

Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission 334

Note 338

Envirocare of Utah, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 339

Notes on Intervention 342

Notes on Public Interest Representation 345

b. Evidentiary Issues 351

Castillo- Villagra v. Immigration and Naturalization Service 353

Notes 360

Notes on Judicial and Administrative Approaches to Evidence 363

Notes on the Limited Application of the Hearsay Rule to Administrative Proceedings 366

c. The Requirement of Findings 369

Armstrong v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 369

Notes 372

d. The Presiding Officer 374

(i)An Impartial Hearer 378

Sec.

1. Initial Hearings in Formal Adjudication-Continued

Central Platte Natural Resources Dist. v. Wyoming 378

Notes 381

(ii) Managerial Controls 384

Nash v. Bowen ; 385

Notes 388

2. Formal Adjudication at the Agency Level-Issues of Role 393

a. The Obligations of Notice and Hearing 394

Morgan v. United States 394

Morgan v. United States 397

Notes 400

b. The Impact of Multiple Roles 407

Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute 408

Notes 412

Withrow v. Larkin 414

Notes 417

c. Obstacles to Integrity Arising From Contacts With Others 423

Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. FLRA 423

Organizational Note 433

(i) General Counsel Gordon: Interested Agency Staff 434

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. 435

Notes 439

(ii) Secretary Lewis--Pressure from Other Parts of Government 443

Portland Audubon Society v. The Endangered Species Committee 444

Note 449

Pillsbury Co. v. FTC 450

Notes 453

(iii) Albert Shanker-Relations With the Regulated and the Public 455

Idaho Historic Preservation Council, Inc. v. City Council of the City of Boise 456

Notes on Inappropriate Relationships 459

Notes on the Revolving Door 462

3. Informal Adjudication 470

5 U.S.C. § 555 470

Note 471

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corporation 472

Notes 474

4. Alternative Dispute Resolution 478

Department of Transportation, "Statement of Policy on Alternative Dispute Resolution" 480

Note 482

CHAPTER V The Procedural Categories in Action: Rulemaking 483

Sec.

1. The Statutory Forms of Rulemaking and the Problem of Authority 484

5 U.S.C. § 553 484

Notes 485

2. Tip of the Iceberg-The Visible Rulemaking Procedures of § 553 493

a. Procedures That Must Be Used? 493

Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida v. Ann M. Veneman 493

Note 497

b. No More Than § 553 Requires? 498

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Cory. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 498

Notes on Vermont Yankee and Its Impact 507

Notes on the Problems of Finding Contested "General" Fact 510

(i) "The notice shall include... (3) Either the terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the

subjects and issues involved" 519

Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection Agency 519

Notes 522

(ii) "After notice required by this section, the agency shall give interested persons an opportunity to participate

in the rule making through submission of written data, views, or arguments with or without opportunity for

oral presentation" 524

United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp. 524

Notes 532 . Notes on the Nature of a Rulemaking Record ' 536

(iii) "After consideration of the relevant matter presented, the agency shall incorporate in the rules adopted a concise

general statement of their basis and purpose" 540

Independent U.S. Tanker Owners Committee v. Dole 540

Notes " 546

(iv) And now, the WorldWideWeb 550

(v) "This subsection does not apply. ..(B) When the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and

a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,

unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest" 552

Utility Solid Waste Activities Group v. Environmental Protection Agency 552

Note 555

3. What Lies Beneath the Surface-The Course of Contemporary Rulemaking 556

a. "Choosing" a Mode for Policymaking 556

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Cory. 556

Notes on Chenery 563

An Organizational Note 566

(i)The Self-Conscious Use of Adjudication for Policy-Making 566

Bell Aerospace Co. v. National Labor Relations Board 567

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. 569

Notes 571

(ii) Might the Retrospectivity Resulting From Adjudication Make this Choice "Unfair"? 574

Epilepsy Foundation of Northeast Ohio v. National Labor Relations Board 574

Notes 576

Sec.

3. What Lies Beneath the Surface-The Course of Contemporary Rulemaking-Continued

(iii) Forewarned is not Enough-Limitations on Retrospective Rulemaking 578

Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital 578

Notes 583

(iv) Limits on the Use of Rulemaking to Eliminate Issues Otherwise Requiring Adjudicatory Hearing 586

Bert M. Yetman et al. v. Jane Garvey, Administrator, FAA 587

Notes 592

b. Getting Rulemaking Started 596

(i) Public Initiation of Rulemaking 596

Professional Pilots Federation v. Federal Aviation Administration 596

Notes 602

(ii) The Decision to Initiate Rulemaking 609

Executive Order 12866 611

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 614

Notes 614

Presidential Management of the Regulatory State 616

Notes 619

(iii) Regulatory Negotiation 627

Notes 630

(iv) Impact Analysis 638

Executive Order 12866 638

Presidential Management of the Regulatory State 639

A Historical Note 639

Notes on the Mechanics of E.O. 12866 642

Notes on the Extent of Presidential Authority 658

c. After the Comments are in-The Decision Process in Rulemaking 663

Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission 666

Notes 669

(i) An Open-Minded Decisionmaker7 673

C & W Fish Company, Inc. v. Fox 673

Notes 676

(ii) The Contributions of Agency Staff 678

United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Marshall 678

Notes 683

(iii) Pressure From External Government Actors 684

Sierra Club v. Costle 684

Notes 692

(iv) What Future Shape(s) for Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking? 698

4. The Publication Alternative to Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking 705

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration 706

Notes 710

General Electric Company v. Environmental Protection Agency 719

Notes 726

Chapter VI Open Government and the Freedom of Information Act 733

Sec.

1. The General Scope of the Freedom of Information Act 733

Notes 736

2. Freedom of Information and the Operational Needs of Agencies 739

a. The Flow of Information Within Agencies 739

National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 740

Notes 745

b. The Flow of Information From the Outside 748

Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 748

Notes 753

3. Private Parties' Desires for Secrecy of Information 753

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown 754

Notes 758

4. Government in the Sunshine 762

Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, American Bar Association,

A Blackletter Statement of Federal Administra tive Law 762

Notes 762

CHAPTER VII Procedural Due Process: Constitutional Constraints on Administrative Decision-making 767

Important Note About Scope 767

Sec.

1. Growing Pains: Due Process Encounters the Ambitions of Modern Government 770

a. The Traditional Right/Privilege Distinction and its "Demise" 770

Bailey v. Richardson 770

Notes 774

Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union v. McElroy 776

Notes 780

b. The Modern Watershed 783

Goldberg v. Kelly 783

Notes 791

Notes on the Ideal of Procedural Fairness and the Reality of Mass Administrative Justice 794

2. Contemporary Doctrine: What Sort of Interests Trigger Due Process Protection? '800

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth 801

Perry v. Sindermann 808 Notes 811

Notes on the Theory of Entitlement Analysis 812

Notes on the Practice of Entitlement Analysis 814

Meachum v. Fano 823

Notes 827

Note on Whether Due Process Itself Requires Standards to Limit Administrative Discretion 832





Sec.

3. Contemporary Doctrine: What Process Is Due? And When? 837

Londoner v. Denver 837

Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Colorado 838

Notes 838

Goldberg v. Kelly 839 ",J

Note 839

a. The Emergence of the Utilitarian Calculus 839

Matthews v. Eldridge 839

Notes 848

Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors 851

Notes 858

Notes on the Theory of Utilitarian Balancing 860

Notes on the Practice of Utilitarian Balancing 862

b. The Relevance of Statutory Process Terms 872

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill 872

Note 879

Notes on the Theory of “The Bitter With the Sweet” 880

Notes on the Practice of “The Bitter With the Sweet” 881

c. The Relevance of Post-Deprivation Judicial Remedies 884

North American Cold Storage Co. v. Chicago 884

Notes 886

Ingraham v. Wnght 888

Note 895

Notes on the Question Whether Common Law or Statutory Remedies are all the Process That is Due 896

Coda 900

CHAPTER VIII Scope of Review of Administrative Action 902

Sec.

1. Perspectives on the Practice of Judicial Review 903

a. Some General Claims 903

b. A Judge's Point of View 904

Harry T. Edwards, The Judicial Function and the Elusive Goal of Principled Decision-making 904

Note 906

c. What the APA Provides 907

5 U.S.C. § 706 Scope of Review 907

Notes 907

2. The Baseline Norm of Legal Regularity 908

a. Consistency of Application 908

Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board 908

Notes 912

Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co., Inc. 915

Notes 919

b. Consistency of Rule Declaration 921

Stieberger v. Heckler 922

Notes 929

3. Judicial Review of Agency Factual Determinations 936

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board 940

Notes 948

Allentown Mack Sales and Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board 953

Notes 963

Sec.

3. Judicial Review of Agency Factual Determinations-Continued

Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 965

Notes 970

Note on the Special Problem of Reviewing "Constitutional" or

"Jurisdictional" Facts 973

4. Judicial Review of Agency Determinations Beyond the Facts 978

a. Historical Building-Block Cases 978

National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc. 979

Notes 984

Skidmore v. Swift & Co. 985

Notes 987

Transitional Note 988

b. The Present-Day Framework 989

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe 989

Notes on the Particular Proceedings 995

Notes on Decision-Makers' Mental Processes 996

Notes on Overton Park's Standard of Review 1000

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 1002

Notes on the Scope and Significance of State Farm 1012

Notes on the Wisdom (or not) of the State Farm Approach 1017

Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 1026

Notes on the Notoriety of Chevron 1032 .

Notes on the Meaning of Chevron 1033

Notes on the Wisdom of Chevron 1040

Notes on the Impact of Chevron 1045

A Final Thought on Chevron 1051

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1052

Notes on MCI's Approach to Statutory Interpretation 1060

Notes on Broader Views of MCI 1064

United States v. Mead Corporation 1068

Notes on What Meads Means 1081

Notes on What Mead Applies To, and How 1084

Notes on Estoppel 1088

Notes on the Early Academic Returns on Mead 1089

Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker 1091

Notes 1096

5. The Best There Is on Judicial Review 1098

Louis L. Jaffe, Judicial Control of Administrative Action 1098

CHAPTER IX Obtaining Judicial Review: Access to Court to Challenge Agency Action or Inaction 1099


Sec.

1. Methods of Obtaining Judicial Review 1100

a. Special Statutory Review 1101

b. General Statutory Review 1104

c. "Nonstatutory" Review 1107

(i) Damages Actions 1107

(ii) Specific Relief: Injunctions, Declarations and the Prerogative Writs 1109

Sec.

1. Methods of Obtaining Judicial Review-Continued

(iii) Special Problems of Suing States to Enforce Regulatory Obligations: State Sovereign Immunity and the Eleventh

Amendment 1112

d. Interim Relief 1116

2. Standing to Invoke Judicial Review 1117

a. Overview: The Contemporary Doctrinal Framework 1118

Allen v. Wright 1118

Note 1126

b. What Sort Of Interests Count? 1128

Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp 1129

Note 1126

(i) “Injury in Fact” 1139

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 1139

Notes 1147

Federal Election Commission v. Akins 1155

Notes 1160

(ii) "Arguably Within the Zone of Interests Protected or Regulated by the Law Invoked" 1162

National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 1163

Notes 1171

c. Traceability and Redressability 1172

Allen v. Wright : , 1172

Notes 1172

Notes on the Relationship Between Defining the Injury and Finding Causation 1176

3. Reviewability: Agency Actions Subject to Judicial Scrutiny 1181

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner 1182

Note 1188

a. § 701(a)(1): Statutory Preclusion of Review 1188

Block v. Community Nutrition Institute 1188

Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians 1192

Notes on Implied Preclusion of Review 1196

Notes on Express Preclusion of Review 1200

b. § 701(a)(2): "Committed to Agency Discretion by Law" 1209

Webster v. Doe 1209

Notes 1216

Notes on Reviewability of Agency Refusals to Act 1218

Note on the Constitutionality of Precluding Review 1224

4. The Timing of Judicial Intervention 1229

Ticor Title Insurance Co. v. Federal Trade Commission 1229

Notes on Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies 1238

Notes on Finality 1246

Notes on Ripeness 1252

5. Actions for Damages as a Form of Review 1257

a. Damages Actions Against Government Officials 1258

North American Cold Storage Co. v. Chicago 1258

Butz v. Economou 1258

Notes 1268

b. Damages Actions Against Government Entities 1278

(i) The Federal Tort Claims Act 1278

Sec.

5. Actions for Damages as a Form of Review-Continued

Berkovitz v. United States 1280

United States v. Gaubert 1284

Note 1289

(ii) The Tucker Act 1289

(iii) Section 1983 1290

Owen v. City of Independence 1291

Notes 1297

APPENDIX

The Constitution of the United States 1303

Administrative Procedure Act 1321

Procedures of Consensus-Regulatory Negotiation and Alternative Dispute Resolution 1354

Negotiated Rulemaking Procedure 1355

Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution in the Administrative Process 1361

Regulatory Planning and Review 1370

Executive Order 12866 1370

INDEX 1383 *