Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
The Responsible Electorate
V. O. Key, Jr.
  •  In his reflective moments even the most experienced politician senses a nagging curiosity about why people vote as they do.


  •  His power and his position depend upon the outcome of the mysterious rites we perform as opposing candidates harangue the multitudes who finally march to the polls to prolong the rule of their champion, to thrust him, ungratefully, back into the void of private life, or to raise to eminence a new tribune of the people.
2
Electoral Behavior
  • What kinds of appeals enable a candidate to win the favor of the great god, The People?


  • What circumstances move voters to shift their preferences in this direction or that?


  • What clever propaganda tactic or slogan led to this result? What mannerism of oratory or style of rhetoric produced another outcome?


  • What band of electors rallied to this candidate to save the day for him?


  • What policy of state attracted the devotion of another bloc of voters? What action repelled a third sector of the electorate?
3
The Mood Of The People
  • The victorious candidate may regard his success as vindication of his beliefs about why voters vote as they do.


  • And he may regard the swing of the vote to him as indubitably a response to the campaign positions he took, as an indication of the acuteness of his intuitive estimates of the mood of the people, and as a ringing manifestation of the esteem in which he is held by a discriminating public
4
What Election Returns Do Not Mean
  • It can be a mischievous error to assume, because a candidate wins, that a majority of the electorate shares his views on public questions, approves his past actions, or has specific expectations about his future conduct.


  • Nor does victory establish that the candidate's campaign strategy, his image, his television style, or his fearless stand against cancer and polio turned the trick.


5
What Election Returns Mean
  • The election returns establish only that a winner attracted a majority of votes--assuming the existence of a modicum of rectitude in election administration. They tell us precious little about why the plurality was his.


6
Voice Of The People Is But An Echo
  • For a glaringly obvious reason, electoral victory cannot be regarded as necessarily a popular ratification of a candidate's outlook.


  • The voice of the people is but an echo. The output of an echo chamber bears an inevitable and invariable relation to the input. As candidates and parties clamor for attention and vie for popular support, the people's verdict can be no more than a selective reflection from among the alternatives and outlooks presented to them.
7
Picture of the Voter as Irrational
  • The picture of the voter that emerges from a combination of the folklore of practical politics and the findings of the new electoral studies is not a pretty one.


  • It is not a portrait of citizens moving to considered decision as they play their solemn role of making and unmaking governments.
8
How Politicians Have Viewed Voters
  • The older tradition from practical politics may regard the voter as an erratic and irrational fellow susceptible to manipulation by skilled humbugs.


  • One need not live through many campaigns to observe politicians, even successful politicians, who act as though they regarded the people as manageable fools.
9
Empirical Voting Literature
  • Nor does a heroic conception of the voter emerge from the new analyses of electoral behavior.


  • They can be added up to a conception of voting not as a civic decision but as an almost purely deterministic act.


  • Given knowledge of certain characteristics of a voter—his occupation, his residence, his religion, his national origin, and perhaps certain of his attributes—one can predict with a high probability the direction of his vote. The actions of persons are made to appear to be only predictable and automatic responses to campaign stimuli.
10
Media and Public Relations Experts
  • Most findings of the analysts of voting never travel beyond the circle of the technicians; the popularizers, though, give wide currency to the most bizarre—and most dubious--theories of electoral behavior.


  • Public-relations experts share in the process of dissemination as they sell their services to politicians (and succeed in establishing that politicians are sometimes as gullible as businessmen). Reporters pick up the latest psychological secret from campaign managers and spread it through a larger public.
11
Importance of Theories of Voting Behavior
  • In short, theories of how voters behave acquire importance not because of their effects on voters, who may proceed blithely unaware of them.


  • They gain significance because of their effects, both potentially and in reality, on candidates and other political leaders.


  • If leaders believe the route to victory is by projection of images and cultivation of styles rather than by advocacy of policies to cope with the problems of the country, they will project images and cultivate styles to the neglect of the substance of politics
12
But Voters Are Not Fools
  • [My] perverse and unorthodox argument. . .is that voters are not fools. To be sure, many individual voters act in odd ways indeed; yet in the large the electorate behaves about as rationally and responsibly as we should expect, given the clarity of the alternatives presented to it and the character of the information available to it.


  • In American presidential campaigns of recent decades the portrait of the American electorate that develops from the data is not one of an electorate straitjacketed by social determinants or moved by subconscious urges triggered by devilishly skillful propagandists.


  • It is rather one of an electorate moved by concern about central and relevant questions of public policy, of governmental performance, and of executive personality.