|
1
|
- Interest groups' high level
of involvement in American elections stems, in part, from distinctive
characteristics of American government, political parties, and
elections.
- First, governmental decision making offers multiple incentives and
opportunities for influencing policy.
|
|
2
|
- Second, the major U.S. parties are permeable to outside interests,
enabling interest group activists to obtain powerful positions within
local, state, and national party organizations.
- Third, American elections are unique: they are much more frequent than
those of most other Western democracies, and far smaller percentages of
citizens vote. Moreover, American elections are candidate centered:
candidates must decide to run, raise their own funds, assemble their own
coalitions, and reach voters with carefully targeted messages—all
of which occurs outside the formal party structure.
|
|
3
|
- At the same time that our federal system creates incentives for interest
group involvement, it also places demands on interest groups, which must
work within the system in order to successfully influence policy.
- First, because policy can be made at the national, state, and local
levels, interest groups are generally called upon to be active at all
three levels.
|
|
4
|
- Second, interest groups are well aware that local councils and state
legislatures constitute a “pipeline” of potential candidates
for the House of Representatives.
- Thus, they often participate in state and local races with the intention
of cultivating arid training potential candidates for national office.
|
|
5
|
- The division of powers between the executive and legislative branches
means that interest groups must try to cultivate access to both the
president and Congress.
- Given that the executive and legislative branches have different
constituencies, timetables, and interests, this is a difficult enough
task, but it has been made even more complex during the past forty years
because the two branches have often been under the control of different
parties.
|
|
6
|
- Because members of Congress are not bound to vote for the policies of
party leaders but are independent actors, even those of the minority
party are in a position to help or hurt an interest group's policy
agenda.
- Any member of the House or Senate can introduce a bill drafted in
consultation with an interest group and offer amendments in committee or
on the floor to make the bill more palatable to interest groups. When a
bill is up for a vote, members of Congress may vote however they choose.
In the Senate, any member can put a “hold” on a bill,
delaying a vote perhaps indefinitely
|
|
7
|
- [I]nterest groups often bolster their lobbying efforts by engaging in
electoral activities. By helping members of Congress win elections,
interest groups hope to establish relationships with senators and
representatives and to get some return on their investment in the form
of public policy actions.
- On occasion, relationships cultivated through electoral activity enable
interest groups to build coalitions in support of their policy
positions, even over the objections of party leaders.
|
|
8
|
- The U.S. government is perhaps more willing than that of many other
countries to distribute particularistic economic benefits to interest
groups.
- Appropriations, tax, and even substantive bills such as highway bills
are generally filled with specific language benefiting one or more
companies or interest groups. Corporations get government contracts,
special tax provisions, and exemptions from regulations (or, more
commonly, delays in implementing regulations), all of which can affect
their profits.
|
|
9
|
- Members of Congress and occasionally even presidents intercede with the
bureaucracy in an attempt to win favorable treatment for particular
groups.
- The opportunity to obtain specific economic benefits is yet another
incentive for interest groups to develop close relationships with policy
makers—and one important way to do so is through electoral
politics.
|
|
10
|
- In the United States, in contrast, elections are held almost
continuously. . . .Because members of the House of
Representatives stand for election every two years, representatives are
constantly running for reelection—raising money, addressing
voters, refining their images and their messages. And their challengers
sometimes begin campaigning more than a year before the election.
- Senators, who are elected for six-year terms, generally campaign for at
least two years, and some focus on fund raising throughout their terms
|
|
11
|
- Another distinctive characteristic of American elections is that they
are candidate centered. . . .The difficulties of running
a candidate-centered campaign render interest groups obvious allies.
- Interest groups can recruit candidates and encourge them to run, help
finance their campaigns, and assist them in selecting campaign themes.
By providing access to special communication channels such as
newsletters and group gatherings, interest groups can also help
candidates reach interest group members effectively and inexpensively
|
|
12
|
- A third unique characteristic of American elections is the low rate of
voter turnout. . . .Low levels of voter turnout create
opportunities for organized groups to greatly influence election
outcomes.
- Finally, American elections are nearly always winner-take-all contests
in single-member districts[creating a strong] incentive for interest
groups to participate in elections. [A small shift in votes can result
in a major change in party power in government.]
|