|
1
|
- Group theory is an important
component of democratic political theory. The essence of group theory is
that in the democratic process interest groups interact naturally and
properly to produce public policy. In American political thought, the
origins of this theory can be found in the theory of concurrent majority
in John C. Calhoun's Disquisition on Government.
|
|
2
|
- It is very useful to discuss the operation of interest groups within the
framework of what can best be described as a concurrent majority system.
- In contemporary usage the phrase concurrent majority means a system in
which major government policy decisions must be approved by the dominant
interest groups directly affected.
|
|
3
|
- [It is necessary for true constitutional government to] prevent any one
interest, or combination of interests, from using the powers of
government to aggrandize itself at the expense of the others.
- [This can only be done by giving] to each division or interest, through
its appropriate organ, either a concurrent voice in making and executing
the laws, or a veto on their execution.
|
|
4
|
- It is only by such [a system of concurrent majority] that the assent of
each can be made necessary to put the government in motion;
- or the power made effectual to arrest its action, when put in motion --
and it is only by the one or the other that the different interests,
orders, classes, or portions, into which the community may be divided,
can be protected, and all conflict and struggle between them prevented
--by rendering it impossible to put or to keep it in action, without the
concurrent consent of all.
|
|
5
|
- It may be readily inferred, from what has been stated, that the effect
of [a concurrent majority system] is neither to supersede nor diminish
the importance of the right of suffrage; but to aid and perfect it.
- The object of the latter is, to collect the sense of the community. The
more fully and perfectly it accomplishes this, the more fully and
perfectly it fulfils its end. But the most it can do, of itself, is to
collect the sense of the greater number; that is, of the stronger
interests, or combination of interests; and to assume this to be the
sense of the community.
|
|
6
|
- It is only when aided by a [a concurrent majority system], that
[government] can collect the sense of the entire community-- of each and
all its interests; of each, through its appropriate [group], and of the
whole, through all of them united.
- [A concurrent majority is] truly be the sense of the entire community;
for whatever diversity each interest might have within itself-- as all
would have the same interest in reference to the action of the
government, the individuals composing each would be fully and truly
represented by its own [group] majority.
|
|
7
|
- There are two different modes in which the sense of the community may be
taken; one, simply by the right of suffrage, unaided; the other, by the
right through a [concurrent majority].
- Each collects the sense of the majority. But [the numerical majority]
regards numbers only, and considers the whole community as a unit,
having but one common interest throughout; and collects the sense of the
greater number of the whole, as that of the community..
|
|
8
|
- The [concurrent majority], on the contrary, regards interests as well as
numbers--considering the community as made up of different and
conflicting interests, as far as the action of the government is
concerned; and takes the sense of each, through its majority or
appropriate organ, and the united sense of all, as the sense of the
entire community.
- The former of these I shall call the numerical, or absolute majority;
and the latter, the concurrent, or constitutional majority. I call it
the constitutional majority, because it is an essential element in every
constitutional government — be its form what it may
|
|
9
|
- So great is the difference, politically speaking, between the two
majorities, that they cannot be confounded, without leading to great and
fatal errors;
- and yet the distinction between them has been so entirely overlooked,
that when the term majority is used in political discussions, it is
applied exclusively to designate the numerical — as if there were no
other.
|
|
10
|
- Until this distinction [between numerical and concurrent majority
systems] is recognized, and better understood, there will continue to be
great liability to error in properly constructing constitutional
governments, especially of the popular form, and of preserving them when
properly constructed.
- Until then, the latter will have a strong tendency to slide, first, into
the government of the numerical majority, and, finally, into absolute
government of some other form
|