|
1
|
- Fourteenth Amendment
- No State shall make or enforce
any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of
the United States;
- nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
- nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of
the laws.
|
|
2
|
- Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate
legislation, the provisions of this article.
|
|
3
|
- SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 83 U.S. 36 (1872)
- No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States
- It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United
States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each
other, and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances
in the individual.
|
|
4
|
- The language is, 'No State shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.'
- It is a little remarkable, if this clause was intended as a protection
to the citizen of a State against the legislative power of his own
State, that the word citizen of the State should be left out when it is
so carefully used, and used in contradistinction to citizens of the
United States, in the very sentence which precedes it.
- It is too clear for argument that the change in phraseology was adopted
understandingly and with a purpose.
|
|
5
|
- Of the privileges and immunities of the citizen of the United States,
and of the privileges and immunities of the citizen of the State, and
what they respectively are, we will presently consider;
- but we wish to state here that it is only the former which are placed by
this clause under the protection of the Federal Constitution, and that
the latter, whatever they may be, are not intended to have any
additional protection by this paragraph of the amendment.
|
|
6
|
- Having shown that the privileges and immunities relied on in the
argument are those which belong to citizens of the States as such, and
that they are left to the State governments for security and protection,
and not by this article placed under the special care of the Federal
government
- The Fourteenth Amendment does not alter the power of the States to
define the civil rights of their citizens
|
|
7
|
- Privileges and Immunities of citizens of the United States are those
fundamental rights of Englishmen which they brought to American.
- States cannot abridge these rights.
- A major purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to give Congress the
authority to protect civil rights in the states
|
|
8
|
- Common and well as statutory law protects rights included as the
privileges and immunities of all citizens.
- The common law of England, as is thus seen, condemned all monopolies in
any known trade or manufacture, and declared void all grants of special
privileges whereby others could be deprived of any liberty which they
previously had, or be hindered in their lawful trade.
|
|
9
|
- The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the fundamental rights or all
citizens against state action that would deny such rights.
- The dissents mention the Bill of Rights only once and do not make it
central to their argument, that the Fourteenth Amendment extends
national power and rights to the states.
|
|
10
|
- 1st Amendment: Fully incorporated.
- 2nd Amendment: No Supreme Court decision on incorporation since 1876
(when it was rejected).
- 3rd Amendment: No Supreme Court decision; 2nd Circuit found to be
incorporated.
- 4th Amendment: Fully incorporated.
.
|
|
11
|
- 5th Amendment: Incorporated except for clause guaranteeing criminal
prosecution only on a grand jury indictment.
- 6th Amendment: Fully incorporated.
- 7th Amendment: Not incorporated.
- 8th Amendment: Incorporated with respect to the protection against
"cruel and unusualpunishments," but no specific Supreme Court
ruling on the incorporation of the "excessive fines" and
"excessive bail" protections
|