|
1
|
- The Role of the Political Parties
- The Parties and Public Policy. Throughout this report political parties
are treated as indispensable instruments of government.
|
|
2
|
- That is to say, we proceed on the proposition that popular government in
a nation of more than 150 million people requires political parties
which provide the electorate with a proper range of choice between
alternatives of action.
- The party system thus serves as the main device for bringing into
continuing relationship those ideas about liberty, majority rule and
leadership which Americans are largely taking for granted.
|
|
3
|
- One of the most pressing requirements of contemporary politics is for
the party in power to furnish a general kind of direction over the
government as a whole.
- The crux of public affairs lies in the necessity for more effective
formulation of general policies and programs and for better integration
of all of the far-flung activities of modern government.
|
|
4
|
- The choices provided by the two-party system are valuable to the
American people in proportion to their definition in terms of public
policy.
- The reasons for the growing emphasis on public policy in party politics
are to be found, above all, in the very operations of modern government.
With the extraordinary growth of the responsibilities of government, the
discussion of public affairs for the most part makes sense only in terms
of public policy.
|
|
5
|
- Modern public policy, therefore, accentuates the importance of the
parties, not as mere brokers between different groups and interests, but
as agencies of the electorate. [Parties aggregate political interests.]
- Because it affects unprecedented numbers of people and because it
depends for its execution on extensive and widespread public support,
modern public policy requires a broad political base. That base can be
provided only by the parties, which reach people touched by no other
political organization.
|
|
6
|
- An effective party system requires, first, that the parties are able to
bring forth programs to which they commit themselves and, second, that
the parties possess sufficient internal cohesion to carry out these
programs. . . .
- Clearly such a degree of unity within the parties cannot be brought
about without party procedures that give a large body of people an
opportunity to share in the development of the party program.
|
|
7
|
- The argument for a stronger party system cannot be divorced from
measures designed to make the parties more fully accountable to the
public.
- The fundamental requirement of such accountability is a two-party system
in which the opposition party acts as the critic of the party in power,
developing, defining and presenting the policy alternatives which are
necessary for a true choice in reaching public decisions
|
|
8
|
- The American people may go too far for the safety of constitutional
government in compensating for this inadequacy by shifting excessive
responsibility to the President.
- With growing public cynicism and continuing proof of the ineffectiveness
of the party system the nation may eventually witness the disintegration
of the two major parties.
|
|
9
|
- The President can attempt to fill the void caused by the absence of an
effective party program by working up a broad political program of his
own.
- If he does, however, he has to go out and build the necessary support
for that program through his personal effort without benefit of party
|
|
10
|
- When the President's program actually is the sole program in this sense,
either his party becomes a flock of sheep or the party falls apart. In
effect this concept of the presidency disposes of the party system by
making the President reach directly for the support of a majority of the
voters.
- It favors a President who exploits skillfully the arts of demagoguery,
who uses the whole country as his political backyard, and who does not
mind turning into the embodiment of personal government.
|
|
11
|
- It is a thing both familiar and deeply disturbing that many Americans
have only caustic words or disdainful shrugs of the shoulder for the
party system as it operates today.
- [Parties do not give the electorate a meaningful choice between programs
that can become law.]
|
|
12
|
- A sizable body of the electorate has shifted from hopeful interest in
the parties to the opposite attitude. This mass of voters sees itself as
the President's or his opponent's direct electoral support.
- Continued alienation between increasing numbers of voters and both major
parties is an ominous tendency. It has a splintering effect and may lead
to a system of several smaller parties. American political institutions
are too firmly grounded upon the two-party system to make its collapse a
small matter.
|
|
13
|
- Orientation of the American two-party system along the lines of
meaningful national programs. . .is a way of keeping
differences within bounds. It is a way of reinforcing the constitutional
framework within which the voter may without peril exercise his freedom
of political choice.
|