|
1
|
- John P. Roche suggests that the
framing of the Constitution was essentially a democratic process
involving the reconciliation of a variety of state, political, and
economic interests
|
|
2
|
- Roche writes: "Perhaps the time has come, to borrow Walton
Hamilton's fine phrase, to raise the framers from immortality to
mortality, to give them credit for their magnificent demonstration of
the art of democratic politics. The point must be reemphasized: they made
history and did it within the limits of consensus."
|
|
3
|
- Roche writes that "the Philadelphia Convention was not a College of
Cardinals or a council of Platonic guardians working in a manipulative,
pre-democratic framework;
- it was a nationalist reform caucus that had to operate with great
delicacy and skill in a political cosmos full of enemies to achieve one
definitive goal—popular approbation."
|
|
4
|
- Roche recognizes that the framers, collectively, were an elite, but he
is careful to point out that they were a political elite dedicated for
the most part to establishing an effective and at the same time
controlled national government that would be able to overcome the
weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
|
|
5
|
- The framers were not, says Roche, a cohesive elite dedicated to a
particular set of political or economic assumptions beyond the simple
need to create a national government that would be capable of
reconciling disparate state interests.
- Roche contrasts with Beard who viewed the Framers an economic elite out
to protect their personal property
|
|
6
|
- When the Constitutionalists went forth to subvert the Confederation,
they utilized the mechanisms of political legitimacy. And the roadblocks
which confronted them were formidable. At the same time, they were
endowed with certain potent political assets.
- The history of the United States from 1786 to 1790 was largely one of a
masterful employment of political expertise by the Constitutionalists as
against bumbling, erratic behavior by the opponents of reform.
Effectively, the Constitutionalists had to induce the states, by
democratic techniques of coercion, to emasculate themselves.
|
|
7
|
- The great achievement of the Constitutionalists was their ultimate
success in convincing the elected representatives of a majority of the
white male population that change was imperative.
- A small group of political leaders with a Continental vision and
essentially a consciousness of the United States’ international
impotence, provided the matrix of the movement.
|
|
8
|
- Their great assets were (1) the presence in their caucus of the one
authentic American "father figure," George Washington, whose
prestige was enormous;
- (2) the energy and talent of their leadership (in which one must include
the towering intellectuals of the time, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson,
despite their absence abroad),
- and their communications "network," which was far superior to
anything on the opposition side
|
|
9
|
- John Roche's article on the framing of the Constitution was written as
an attack upon a variety of views that suggested the Constitution was
not so much a practical political document as an expression of elitist
views based upon political philosophy and economic interests [Charles
Beard].
|